SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 46199

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
T.Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
Inspector General of Registration – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.R.Priyanka Jothi
For the Respondents: F.Deepak

The registration of a sale deed cannot be refused under S.22-A of the Registration Act on the ground of potential land-use violation, provided the parties furnish a binding affidavit undertaking not to develop or change the land use without obtaining necessary planning approvals.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged the refusal by the Sub-Registrar to register a sale deed under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, citing the absence of planning authority approval for potential residential use. The Court analyzed the limitation on the right to property under Article 300-A in the context of development control legislation. It held that where parties do not intend to change the land's nature, the document must be registered upon the claimant providing an undertaking via affidavit not to use or develop the land for residential/commercial purposes without due permission. The core issue was whether the Sub-Registrar can refuse the registration of a document simply because the land might eventually be used for prohibited purposes. The Court, drawing upon the ratio in prior decisions, held that enforcement of planning regulations at the stage of document registration is unwarranted if the parties express an intention to maintain the existing nature of the land, provided a binding undertaking is filed to prevent unauthorized development. The writ petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside, and the respondent is directed to register the document upon the petitioner filing the required affidavits of undertaking.

Table of Content
1. challenge to refusal of registration based on planning authority requirements. (Para 1)
2. mandate requiring registration upon submission of an undertaking via affidavit. (Para 2 , 3)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 28.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY T.Rajesh ... Petitioner

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 009.

2.The District Registrar, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District.

3.The Sub Registrar, Kottaram Sub Registrar Office, Kottaram, Kanniyakumari District. ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned refusal check slip issued by the 3rd respondent vide Refusal check slip No.RFL/Kottaram/71/2026 dated 06.04.2026 and quash the same and consequently, to direct the 3rd respondent to register the sale deed dated 06.04.2026 presented by the petitioner in respect of the land to extent of 13 cents comprised in New Survey No.348/8S situates at Kovalam Village, Agasteeswaram Taluk, Kanniyakumari District within a time frame fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Ms.M.R.Priyanka Jothi For Respondents : Mr.F.Deepak Special Government Pleader ORDER This Writ Petition challenges the impugned refusal check slip. The document is refused registration under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, on the ground that the property is conveyed as a residential plot or for residential use without approval from the planning authority to convert the site into a residential one. In this case, the petitioner contends that the land is conveyed as such, without changing its use.

2. In such cases, the matter is no longer res-integra and is governed by the judgement of this Court in Sankarakumar & another vs. The Sub-Registrar, Panpozhi [W.P.(MD)No.29522 of 2025, dated 17.04.2026]. This Court considered the purport of Section 22-A(2), the need to balance the Constitutional Right of the owners of the property under Article 300-A with the enforcement of development control legislation and the rules framed thereunder. It held that, irrespective of the location of the land, if the executant and the claimant of the document express an intention to use the property as such, without converting its nature, then, irrespective of the size of the land, boundary, abutting a pathway/road, etc., the document shall be registered, on condition that affidavits in four sets be executed and filed before this Court, the Sub-Registrar, the local body and the TANGEDCO. It is made clear that the party breaching the undertaking will also be liable for contempt of this Court, in addition to other actions.

3. The affidavit containing the following undertaking shall be executed by the claimant in whose favour the title vests under the document:

''I undertake not to use the property as a residential/commercial site or such other change of user, unless due permission is obtained from the planning authority. Without due approval, I will not develop the site by changing its use, and will not put up any residential or commercial building. I am aware that I may be liable to punishment for contempt of Court for violating this undertaking. I am also aware that I will not be entitled to claim electricity connection or water, sewerage, and other connections or services from the local authority or any other authority unless due conversion is made as per the permission of the planning authority.'' 4. This writ petition is allowed on the following terms:

(i) The impugned order shall stand set aside.

(ii) The claimant under the document refused for registration, in whose name the property vests, shall execute a duly notarised affidavit in four sets and file one set before this Court within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the web copy of this order; Only upon filing of the same, a certified copy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top