SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 46225

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
Anisha – Appellant
Versus
Sub Registrar, Eraniel, Kanyakumari District – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.Russel Raj
For the Respondents: A.Baskaran

Registration of a property document cannot be denied under Section 22-A of the Registration Act on the ground of non-conversion of land use if the parties undertake not to change the nature of the land or develop it without prior approval from the relevant planning authority.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the sub-registrar to register a sale deed under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, citing lack of planning authority approval for residential use. The court analyzed the registration requirements, emphasizing that landowners retain rights under Article 300-A. The court found that if the parties intend to maintain the land's current use without conversion, registration should proceed provided an undertaking is filed. The core issue was whether the registration of a land conveyance can be denied solely on the grounds of lack of conversion approval when no immediate change of use is intended. The court held that, following the principle established in precedent, registration is permissible if the claimant executes an affidavit undertaking not to change the land's use or develop it without proper planning permission, and accepting liability for contempt if the undertaking is breached. The writ petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside, and the petitioner is directed to file the required notarized affidavits to facilitate the registration of the sale deed, subject to adherence to the established conditions.

Table of Content
1. challenge to refusal of sale deed registration based on section 22-a. (Para 1)
2. governing precedent allows registration with an undertaking not to change land use. (Para 2 , 3)

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 28.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Anisha ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Sub Registrar, Eraniel, Kanyakumari District.

2.Rajeswari ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 1st respondent dated 05.02.2026 in Refusal Check Slip bearing Refusal Number RFL/Eraniel/46/2026, quash the same, and consequently direct the 1st respondent to register and release the sale deed dated 05.02.2026 executed by the 2nd respondent in favour of the petitioner/purchaser, in respect of 5.250 cents of land comprised in Survey No. 371/8A2, situated at Talakulam Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Russel Raj For Respondents : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader for R1 ORDER This Writ Petition challenges the impugned refusal check slip. The document is refused registration under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, on the ground that the property is conveyed as a residential plot or for residential use without approval from the planning authority to convert the site into a residential one. In this case, the petitioner contends that the land is conveyed as such, without changing its use.

2. In such cases, the matter is no longer res-integra and is governed by the judgement of this Court in Sankarakumar & another vs. The Sub-Registrar, Panpozhi [W.P.(MD)No.29522 of 2025, dated 17.04.2026]. This Court considered the purport of Section 22-A(2), the need to balance the Constitutional Right of the owners of the property under Article 300-A with the enforcement of development control legislation and the rules framed thereunder. It held that, irrespective of the location of the land, if the executant and the claimant of the document express an intention to use the property as such, without converting its nature, then, irrespective of the size of the land, boundary, abutting a pathway/road, etc., the document shall be registered, on condition that affidavits in four sets be executed and filed before this Court, the Sub-Registrar, the local body and the TANGEDCO. It is made clear that the party breaching the undertaking will also be liable for contempt of this Court, in addition to other actions.

3. The affidavit containing the following undertaking shall be executed by the claimant in whose favour the title vests under the document:

''I undertake not to use the property as a residential/commercial site or such other change of user, unless due permission is obtained from the planning authority. Without due approval, I will not develop the site by changing its use, and will not put up any residential or commercial building. I am aware that I may be liable to punishment for contempt of Court for violating this undertaking. I am also aware that I will not be entitled to claim electricity connection or water, sewerage, and other connections or services from the local authority or any other authority unless due conversion is made as per the permission of the planning authority.''

4. This writ petition is allowed on the following terms:

(i) The impugned order shall stand set aside.

(ii) The claimant under the document refused for registration, in whose name the property vests, shall execute a duly notarised affidavit in four sets and file one set before this Court within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the web copy of this order; Only upon filing of the same, a certified copy of this order shall be issued to the petitioner.

(iii) Along with the certified copy of the order of this Court, the petitioner will be entitled to represent the document along with three sets of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top