IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J
Zahir Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing the factual context and the petitioner's role versus the alleged criminal act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. analysis of essential ingredients for section 304 ipc and reasons for quashing proceedings. (Para 4 , 5) |
for R1 Order This petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.14 of 2003 on the file of the 1st respondent police registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304A and 304(i) of IPC.
2.The case of the prosecution is that while the daughter of the 2nd respondent was proceeding on 17.03.2003 from the Metro Railway Station to her office through the subway at Thousand Lights, the accused had allegedly demolished an old structure by using a 140 LR Poclain machine without adopting any safety measures or issuing any prior caution to the public. Due to the said demolition work, the debris from the demolished structure allegedly fell on the daughter of the 2nd respondent and caused grievous injuries to her. As a result of which the deceased succumbed to the injuries. Based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent police registered a case in Crime No.14 of 2003 for the offences punishable under Section 304A IPC. 3. The subje
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.