Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J
R.S.Arockia Sahaya Rani – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedures for admission and the initial grievance concerning pay refixation and recovery. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. application of established judicial precedents regarding the illegality of recovering excess payments of pay scales and the requirement for formal rule amendments. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the first to fourth respondents and Mr.P.Gunasekaran, learned counsel, takes notice for the fifth respondent.
2. With the consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first to fourth respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent.
4. This Writ Petition has been filed against the order dated
16.03.2026 passed by the fourth respondent re-fixing the pay of the petitioner and ordering for recovery of certain amounts pursuant to re- fixation of pay in terms of the Government Orders in G.O.(Ms.) No.234, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 01.06.2009 and G.O.(Ms.) No.23, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 12.01.2011.
5. Today, w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
