SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 46513

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS


WP No. 13455 of 2023


DATED: 08-04-2026


THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


V.Dhanasekaran, S/o. Veerasami,


No.237, Mariamman Koil Street, Malalinatham Colony,


Melaripakkam Post, Thirukazhukundram,


Chengalpattu District.


Petitioner(s)


Vs


1.The District Registrar, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.


2.The Joint Sub Registrar, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.


3.G. Suresh, Thirupurkumaran Nagar,


3rd Street, Deshmugipettai, Thirukazhukundrram,


Kancheepuram District.


Respondent(s)


For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Muthappan


For Respondent(s): Ms.K.Aswini Devi Additional Government Pleader For R1 & R2


No Appearance For R3

PRAYER:-

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 6.7.2022 and conduct the enquiry and cancel the sale deed dated 16.04.2015 registered as document No.1070 of 2015 on the file of 2nd respondent within time stipulated by this Court.

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 6.7.2022 and conduct the enquiry and cancel the sale deed dated 16.04.2015 registered as document No.1070 of 2015 on the file of 2nd respondent.

2.Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the petitioner has sought to consider his representation and cancel the sale deed. Since Section 77-A of the Registration Act, 1908 was struck down by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court, the prayer sought for in the present writ petition cannot be entertained. Hence, he prayed to pass appropriate orders.

3.As rightly contended by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, the official respondents have no power to cancel the sale deed as requested by the petitioner in his representation dated 06.07.2022, since Section 77-A of the Registration Act, 1908, was struck down.

Hence, no mandamus can be issued as requested by the petitioner.

4.In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top