Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
R. Hari Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Inspector General of Registration – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests mandatory registration of sale certificate without fees under s.89(4) registration act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. mandatory fees under valid government orders must be paid absent a formal challenge. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court directs compliance with fee order or formal challenge to the notification. (Para 7) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY R.Hari Krishna .. Petitioner – Vs. -
–
1.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-28.
2.The Sub Registrar-I, Kommadikottai Sub Registration Office, Thoothukudi-628 653.
3.The Authorized Officer, Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Madurai Chinthamani Branch, 248B, Rekha Towers, Kamarajar Salai, Madurai 625 009. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to receive the sale certificate dated 08.12.2025 issued by the third respondent and file the same in Book No.1 under Section 89(4) of the Registration Act, 1908, without insisting on the payment of stamp duty and registration char
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
