Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Sathish Kumar, M.Jothiraman, JJ
Jalaludeen – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background involving municipal sealing notice and familial property dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions regarding structural safety and municipal authority powers. (Para 5) |
| 3. necessity of expert structural evaluation to justify building sealing orders. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
Challenging the lock and seal notice dated 25.04.2026 issued by the 2nd respondent, the present Writ Petition has been filed. 2. It is the contention of the petitioner that the petitioner and the 4th respondent are siblings, and their mother had allotted 728 square feet on the second floor and 462 square feet on the first floor, comprised in T.S. No.183/3, New Ward No. E, New Block No. 19, Meenkara Street, Thennur, Trichy, to the petitioner and the 4th respondent. Since a dispute arose between the brothers regarding the construction of a small thatched tin-sheeted room on the third floor, the 4th respondent filed a Writ Petition in W.P.(MD) No. 26634 of 2024, seeking a direction to the authorities to take action against the alleged unauthorised construction made by the petitioner.
3. This Court, by order dated 06.12.2024
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
