SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 47276

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
Sulochana Arjunan – Appellant
Versus
Regional Transport Authority – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: T. Padmanabhan
For the Respondents: M. Sivavarthanan

The court directed the respondent authorities to consider an applicant's request to withdraw a previously filed application for transfer of a bus permit, ensuring the matter is disposed of in accordance with law within a set timeframe.

Headnote:The present case involves a challenge under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India regarding the transfer of a mini bus permit. The petitioner originally sought the transfer of her permit due to age-related ailments. Subsequently, the petitioner requested to withdraw the transfer application and sought a direction from the Court to have this withdrawal considered by the authorities. The core issue is whether the authority is mandated to consider a request for the withdrawal of a pending application for permit transfer. The court, noting the petitioner's change in stance, determined that a fresh representation for withdrawal serves the interest of justice, thereby directing the respondent to consider such request in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of with directions to the respondent to consider the fresh representation within the stipulated time frame.

Table of Content
1. summary of facts regarding the original permit transfer application and subsequent dispute. (Para 1 , 2)
2. submission by parties regarding the withdrawal of the permit transfer application. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's directive to handle the withdrawal request of the permit application. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to take back the petitioner’s application dated 25.03.2026 along with the documents for the transfer of permit of mini bus TN 39 DF 0707 plying on the route Sulur Perumalkoil to Pappampatti.

2. It is stated that the petitioner is the holder of a Mini Bus permit granted by the 1st respondent for operating the service on the route Sulur Perumalkoil to Pappampatti, Coimbatore District, valid from 18.07.2025. Later, she submitted application for transfer of permit in favour of her grandson as the said request was due to her age ailments. It is the grievance of the petitioner that without considering the ground realities, the 2nd respondent returned the said application stating impediment for transfer. In such circumstances, this writ petition has been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has now decided not to pursue the application for transfer of permit. He further submitted that a direction may be issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner's request for withdrawal of the application dated 25.03.2026 and pass appropriate orders. In view of the above, he prayed for issuance of suitable directions to consider the petitioner’s claim, within a time frame.

4. Learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that if any such representation seeking withdrawal of the application is pending, the same would be considered in accordance with law and appropriate orders would be passed within a stipulated time frame.

5. This Court has considered the submissions made by learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. In view of the limited relief now sought by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the earlier application seeking transfer of permit, this Court directs the petitioner to submit a fresh representation along with this order copy to the 1st respondent, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such submission, the 1st respondent shall consider the petitioner's claim and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks thereafter.

7. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top