Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T.Asha, J
N.P.Indhumathy – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of relief sought regarding pension and pay fixation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. analysis of previous litigation where petitioner conceded to pay re-fixation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. dismissal of writ petition based on prior concession. (Para 7) |
ORDER
This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
“To direct respondents to fix the revised pension pay of the petitioner upon the pay drawn at Rs.72,300 with applicable D.A., besides directing them to pay the arrears of pension from 01.04.2024 onwards till the date of payment, together with applicable interest.”
2. The petitioner joined the Revenue Department as a Typist on
19.10.1994. The petitioner retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.03.2024, as Tahsildar. The grievance of the petitioner is that her basic pay of Rs.72,300/- was reduced to a sum of Rs.66,200/-.
Therefore aggrieved the petitioner is before this Court. 3. Heard the learned counsels and perused the records.
4. The petitioner has earlier filed a writ petition in WP.No.22770 of 2025 for the following relief:
“To call for the records of the first respondent i.e. the District Collector, Mayiladuthurai in his proceedings in Na.Ka.6864/2022
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
