SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 47781

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Aishwarya Engineering – Appellant
Versus
Joint Commissioner (ST) – Respondent
W.M.P.No.20113 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C. Baktha Siromoni
For the Respondents: R. Sethu Prabakaran

The Court maintains judicial consistency by allowing the conditional restoration of a cancelled GST registration, provided the taxpayer fulfills all outstanding tax liabilities, penalties, and filing requirements, while restricting the utilization of Input Tax Credit pending official verification.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of cancellation of GST registration due to non-filing of monthly returns. The Court analyzed the provisions of the CGST and SGST Acts regarding registration compliance. The main issue was whether the GST registration should be restored despite non-compliance with filing returns. Following the ratio in Suguna Cutpiece v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST), the Court held that registration could be restored subject to strict compliance with filing returns, payment of tax, interest, and penalties, and adhering to restrictions on unutilized Input Tax Credit. The writ petition is disposed of on the terms specified in the cited precedent.

Table of Content
1. challenge to gst registration cancellation based on non-filing of returns. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. conditional restoration of registration subject to payment of tax, interest, and verified usage of input credit. (Para 4 , 6 , 7)

ORDER

The petitioner challenges an order of cancellation of her GST registration.

The petitioner is a manufacturer of industrial tools, dies and fixtures and was a registered person under applicable GST laws. Pursuant to a show cause notice dated 03.04.2025 stating that the petitioner had not filed GST monthly returns regularly, the impugned order was issued.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cancellation of the GST registration is causing immense hardship and that such cancellation should be revoked. In support of his contentions, he draws reference to the Judgment of this Court in Suguna Cutpiece v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST), W.P.Nos.25048 of 2021 batch (Suguna Cutpiece).

3. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. He submits that the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled on account of the petitioner not filing returns regularly. He further submits that the order issued in Suguna Cutpiece was a conditional order and that the petitioner should be directed to comply with all conditions stipulated therein.

4. In Suguna Cutpiece, this Court directed restoration of GST registration subject to several terms and conditions. The said judgment was followed thereafter in many cases. In order to maintain consistency, I am inclined to follow the said judgment.

5. In the operative portion thereof, the following directions were issued:

"i. The petitioner is directed to file her returns for the period prior to the cancellation of registration, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of forty five (45) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

ii. It is made clear that such payment of tax, interest, fine /

fee and etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of the petitioner.

iii. If any Input Tax Credit has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or competent officer of the Department.

iv. Only such approved Input Tax Credit shall be allowed to utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rules.

v. The petitioner shall also pay GST and file the returns for the period subsequent to the cancellation of the registration by declaring the correct value of supplies.

vi. If any Input Tax Credit was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondents or any other competent authority.

vii. On payment of tax, penalty and uploading of returns, the registration shall stand revived forthwith.

viii. The respondents shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and to pay the tax / penalty /

fine.

ix. The above exercise shall be carried out by the respondents within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

6. The restoration of the GST registration is subject to and conditional upon fulfilling the above conditions.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of on the same terms without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top