SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 47797

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.Victoria Gowri, J
P.Siva – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C.S.Saravanan
For the Respondents: P.Vetrivel

The game of rummy (13 cards) is a game of skill, not gambling, provided it is played without stakes. Police cannot arbitrarily interfere with club affairs unless there is reliable information of illegal gaming activities or the playing of rummy for profit or stakes.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to restrain the respondent police from interfering with the peaceful functioning of a recreation club, specifically regarding the playing of rummy. The court analyzed whether the game of rummy constitutes gambling and the limits of police interference in private club affairs. The main issue was whether the respondent authorities could be restrained from frequent interference without evidence of illegal activity and whether the club could be permitted to conduct card games. Applying the ratio from earlier precedents, the court held that playing rummy (13 cards) without stakes is a game of skill and does not attract penal provisions. The writ petition is disposed of with directions permitting the club to conduct rummy games without stakes, while authorizing police action if illegal activities involving stakes are detected.

Table of Content
1. petitioner requests protection from police harassment regarding internal club activities. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. legal status of rummy as a game of skill versus illegal gambling. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court outlines specific conditions for legal operation of clubs and police oversight. (Para 6)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to forbear the respondents from interfering in any manner with the affairs of the petitioner’s club, viz., S.P.S. Recreation Club, Thoothukudi, SRG/Tuticorin/26/2026, situated at 5/104/3, Amman Koil Street, Siruthondanallur, Eral Taluk, Thoothukudi District – 628 802, including its members and the facilities provided for playing various games, including rummy without any element of gambling.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner club is being subjected to continuous harassment and that the respondent police are interfering with the peaceful conduct of its activities. It was further submitted that such interference is unwarranted and that the respondents ought to be restrained from interfering with the peaceful functioning of the club, particularly with regard to the playing of rummy without money. Accordingly, the present writ petition has been filed. In support of his contention, he also relied upon an order of this Court dated WP CRL.(MD)No.2459 of 2025 dated

09.12.2025.

3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is wholly baseless and that the third respondent police has not interfered with the affairs of the petitioner club. It was further submitted that the petitioner had already given a statement before the respondent police on 03.06.2026 to the effect that no harassment was faced by the petitioner club at the hands of the third respondent police.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court.

5. This Court, in WP CRL.(MD)No.2459 of 2025 dated 09.12.2025, held as follows:-

“5. The submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) is recorded. It is also seen that a Division Bench of this Court in the case of the Director General of Police, State of Tamil Nadu, Mahalakshmi Cultural Association report in 2012(2) CTC 484 has gone into this aspect of recreation club permitting the recreation club to play rummy without stakes and held as follows :

"24. On the basis of the above discussions, we arrive at the following conclusions:

(1) The game of rummy (13 card) is only a game of skill even though an element of chance is also involved.

(2) In the event rummy is played by the members or the guests without stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are not attracted.

(3) In the event rummy is played by the members of the guests with stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are attracted.

(4) In the event the Club/Association either allows its members or gusts to play rummy with stakes or make any profit or gain out of such gambling, the police has the authority to invoke the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act.

(5) In order to ascertain as to whether the premises is used as a gaming house for gambling, the police is entitles to invoke Section 23 of the Act."

6. In view of the above, this Court directs that (i) the petitioner Club shall not indulge in any activity by allowing its members or the guests to play rummy (13 cards) with stakes and make profit or gain.

(ii) the police are entitled to take action in the event of any illegal activity is carried on in the Club premises.

(iii) the police shall not disturb the petitioner-Club frequently under the guise of inspection without there being any reliable information as to the illegal activities of the Club or its members or the guests.”

5. In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police, this Court imposes the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner club is permitted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top