SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 47835

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Nirmal Kumar, J
Thirumalai – Appellant
Versus
Rajeswari – Respondent
CRL MP NO. 6452 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.Balasubramanian

The appellate court has the discretion to grant an extension of time for complying with the statutory requirement of depositing a portion of the compensation amount as a condition for the suspension of sentence under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The matter involves proceedings under S.148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, relating to the deposit of compensation during the pendency of an appeal against a conviction under S.138 of the Act. Facts: The petitioner, convicted for an offence under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed an appeal against the conviction and sentence. The appellate court ordered a suspension of sentence subject to the condition of depositing 15% of the compensation awarded by the trial court. The petitioner sought a reduction in the deposit amount and an extension of time for compliance. Findings: The Court declined to reduce the prescribed percentage of compensation but granted an extension of time for the deposit, emphasizing strict compliance.

Issues: The court considered whether to exercise discretion in modifying the conditions imposed for the suspension of sentence, specifically the quantum of compensation deposit and the timeline for compliance.

Ratio Decidendi: While the court maintains the statutory requirement to protect the interest of the complainant in financial crimes, it possesses the inherent power to grant reasonable extensions for compliance with deposit orders provided such extensions are final and peremptory.

Result: The petition was disposed of with the court granting an extension of four weeks for the petitioner to deposit the required 15% of the compensation amount, failing which the suspension of sentence shall stand cancelled.

Table of Content
1. summary of conviction for dishonour of cheque. (Para 1)
2. appellate court conditions for suspension of conviction sentence. (Para 2)
3. discretionary extension of time for deposit of compensation. (Para 3)

ORDER

The petitioner, who was facing trial in section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act case, was convicted by the trial court in S.T.C.No.1024 of 2023 vide judgment dated 08.01.2026. The trial court sentenced the petitioner to undergo eight months simple imprisonment and to pay a compensation of Rs.75,00,000/- along with 6% interest per annum within one month, in default to undergo four months simple imprisonment.

2.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, aggrieved over the said judgment, the petitioner has preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.183 of 2026 and also filed a suspension of sentence petition in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2026. The lower appellate court while suspending the sentence had directed the petitioner to execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties on or before 23.02.2026 and had further directed the petitioner to deposit 15% of the compensation amount to the credit of S.T.C.No.1024 of 2023 within sixty days from the date of the order. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was unable to mobilize the 15% of the compensation amount and hence filed the present petition seeking to reduce the deposit amount and also extension of time to deposit the same.

3.This court has heard the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the nature of the case and the amount involved in this case, this court is not inclined to reduce the deposit amount of 15% of the compensation amount but is inclined to grant a time period of four weeks to deposit the same in the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the time is granted and the petitioner shall deposit 15% of the compensation amount on or before 03.07.2026, as directed by the lower appellate court to the credit of S.T.C.No.1024 of 2023 before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court V, Saidapet, Chennai. It is made clear that no further extension of time shall be granted to the petitioner and if the petitioner fails to deposit the 15% of the compensation amount within the stipulated period, i.e., on or before 03.07.2026, the suspension of sentence granted by the lower appellate court shall stand cancelled. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top