Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
Mohamed Fathima – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to disburse salary after proper appointment and sanction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. entitlement to salary parity based on prior judicial precedents and government orders. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
ORDER
The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 4 to disburse the arrears of salary to the petitioner for the period from 03.10.2022 to 31.03.2023 with all consequential attendant and monetary benefits in the light of G.O.(2D) No.32, dated 13.10.2025.
2. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Professor in the Commerce Department in a sanctioned vacancy in the 5th respondent-College, which is a minority institution. The petitioner had joined the duty on 03.10.2022. Necessary approval and sanction orders were granted to the petitioner by the respondents 3 and 4, confirming her appointment with effect from 03.10.2022. However, the petitioner had been paid with the salary only from 01.04.2023, and no salary was paid for the period 03.10.2022 to 31.03.2023. Therefore, the petitioner had submitted her representations on 12.06.2024 and 23.02.2026, to the respondents 1,3 and 4 requesting to release the arrears of salary for the period from 03.10.2022 to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
