SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 47986

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
P. Bageerathan – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N. Desinghu
For the Respondents: K. Raja

An employer is legally obligated to pay interest on delayed disbursement of terminal benefits and differential amounts arising from a validly entered Industrial Disputes Act settlement.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent authorities to release terminal and retirement benefits, including interest for delayed payments, following a wage settlement under S. 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court found that the employee was entitled to revised terminal benefits as per the settlement, which had remained unpaid or settled without interest despite representation. The main issue was whether the respondent Corporation is liable to pay interest on delayed terminal benefits and the differential amount arising from the wage settlement. The court reasoned that in view of the settlement arrived at under S. 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the employee is legally entitled to the revised benefits and interest on the delay. The court directed the respondents to pay interest at 6% per annum for the belated payment of terminal benefits and the differential amount of leave salary and gratuity within six weeks.

Table of Content
1. basis for entitlement to terminal benefits based on industrial settlements. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court intervention to enforce payment of interest on delayed retirement benefits. (Para 5 , 6)

PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to disburse the belated payment of interest amount of provident Fund, Gratuity, commutation and Earned Leave Salary amounts and other unsettle benefits of Difference amount of Gratuity and E.L. Salary as per 12 (3) wage Settlement and 10 days last month salary with effect from 01.07.2025 within the stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner(s): Mr. N.Desinghu For Respondent(s): Mr. K. Raja, Standing Counsel

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to disburse the belated payment of interest amount of provident Fund, Gratuity, commutation and Earned Leave Salary amounts and other unsettle benefits of Difference amount of Gratuity and E.L. Salary as per 12 (3) wage Settlement and 10 days last month salary with effect from

01.07.2025 within the stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he had joined the services of the first respondent-Corporation as a Conductor on 19.02.1987 and had retired from service on 30.06.2025, on attaining the age of superannuation. The petitioner would submit that a settlement was entered into under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, on 29.05.2025.

3. The contention of the petitioner is that he is entitled to the revision of pay and consequential terminal benefits. However, the said benefits have not been extended to him and he was paid the terminal benefits based on the pre-revised pay and not as per the said settlement and his terminal benefits were also settled belatedly. Therefore, the petitioner had submitted a representation on 23.03.2026 to the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 18% for the belated terminal benefits and the differential amount in leave salary and gratuity as per 12(3) Settlement along with interest, but the same was not considered till date. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court, to espouse the said cause. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on records.

5. The stand of the petitioner cannot be disputed. In view of the Settlement arrived at under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which entitles the employees of the Transport Corporation to revision of pay including gratuity and encashment of leave, the respondents are directed (i) to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of admissible terminal benefits from the date of retirement till the date of actual disbursal of the terminal benefits of the petitioner, and (ii) to pay the eligible differential amount in leave salary and gratuity as per the said Settlement along with admissible interest. The amounts shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top