Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J
Arockiamary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consensus on following established precedents for uniform disposal of similar service matters. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. prohibition of recovery of excess payments from retired employees and procedural guidelines for future pay refixation. (Para 7 , 8) |
O R D E R
Mrs.K.Porkodi, learned Government Counsel, takes notice for the respondents 1, 2, 4 and 5. Mr.P.Gunasekaran, learned counsel, takes notice for the third respondent.
2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Counsel and counsel appearing for the respondents.
4. The present petition has been filed against orders passed by the respondent authorities re-fixing the pay of the petitioner and ordering for recovery of certain amounts pursuant to refixation of pay in terms of G.O.(Ms.)No.234, Finance(Pay and Cell) Department dated 01.06.2009 and G.O.(Ms.)No.23, Finance(Pay and Cell) Department dated
12.01.2011.
5. Mrs.K.Porkodi, learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents 1, 2, 4 and 5 fairly submitted that an identical issue has fallen for consideration before a co-ordinate bench of the Pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
