IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J
R. Shanmugaperial Tamilselvi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedure for pay fixation and protection against recovery of excess payments for employees. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
O R D E R
Mrs.K.Porkodi, learned Government Counsel, takes notice for the respondents 1, 2, 4 and 5. Mrs.Chamundi, learned counsel, takes notice for the third respondent.
2. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Counsel and counsel appearing for the respondents.
4. The present petition has been filed against orders passed by the respondent authorities re-fixing the pay of the petitioner and ordering for recovery of certain amounts pursuant to refixation of pay in terms of G.O.(Ms.)No.234, Finance(Pay and Cell) Department dated 01.06.2009 and G.O.(Ms.)No.23, Finance(Pay and Cell) Department dated
12.01.2011.
5. Mrs.K.Porkodi, learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents 1, 2, 4 and 5 fairly submitted that an identical issue has fallen for consideration before a co-ordinate bench of the Principal Seat of this Court in W.P.No.12275 of 2024 and batch and the said batch of writ petitions have been disposed of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.