Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Sathish Kumar, M.Jothiraman, JJ
Rethinam – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts and the nature of the challenge against eviction orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. requirement to exhaust alternative revisional remedies before seeking writ jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of 2nd respondent in Moo.Mu.A1/3224/2025 dated 23.02.2026 confirmed by consequential impugned order of 1st respondent in Na.Ka No.E4/26590/2025 dated 13.03.2026, quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents herein from in any manner interfering with the possession and enjoyment of petitioner in Survey No.428/25, Paruthiyur Village, Puliyal Post, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District, in view of registered title deed dated 30.08.1897.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Muruganandam
For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Parthiban (R1 to R6)
Counsel for the State
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
Challenging the order of the District Collector dismissing the appeal filed as against the order of eviction under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act, the present writ petition is filed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
