Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Nirmal Kumar, J
K. Krishnasamy – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and initiation of the criminal complaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. summary of rival arguments regarding the nature of the assembly. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on fundamental rights and lack of evidence for criminal offense. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. final order quashing the criminal proceedings. (Para 8) |
Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS to call for records and quash the Charge Sheet in S.T.C.No.1283/2025 on the file of Judicial Magistrate - II, Erode and thus render justice.
ORDER
The petitioner / A15 facing trial in S.T.C.No.1283 of 2025 for the offence under Section 147 and 341 IPC pending trial before the learned Judicial Magistrate – II, Erode, had filed this quash petition.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 10.01.2024 the petitioner along with other 47 persons belonging to State Transport Corporation having allegiance to AITUC and CITU, have assembled in front of a bus depot and formed an unlawful assembly causing inconvenience to the public movement and vehicle raising six demands which has not been implemented as agreed by the Management earlier. The respondent police had warned the petitioner and other protestors to mov
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
