Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
Farithabegam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes regarding the executability of a decree based on survey record discrepancies. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the court's reliance on boundary descriptions when official survey data is missing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. remand to the lower court for re-measurement based on documented boundaries. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the order dated 19.02.2026 passed in E.A.No.7 of 2024 in E.P.No.39 of 2019 by the District Munsif at Mathuranthakam and allow the objection.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Vijayakumar
For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For R1 To R5
ORDER
The revision petitioners/judgment debtors filed an application in E.A.No.7 of 2024 under Section 47 of Code of Civil Procedure to dismiss the Execution Petition in EP No.39 of 2019 on the ground that the decree is not executable and obtained by playing fraud. The said application was dismissed on hearing both sides. Aggrieved over the same, the judgment debtors have preferred the present revision.
2. Learned counsel for the revision petitioners/judgment debtors submits that the boundary description found in the plaint schedule along w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
