SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 48461

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Seetharaman – Appellant
Versus
Muthukumaran – Respondent


PRAYER

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 27.03.2026 made in I.A.No.58 of 2026 in O.S.No.62 of 2024 passed by the I Additional District Munsif Court, Tirukoilur.

ORDER

This civil revision petition has been filed, challenging the order dated 27.03.2026 passed in I.A. No.58 of 2026 in O.S.No.62 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Tirukoilur.

The aforesaid order was passed by the Trial Court, dismissing the petitioner’s application filed under Section 10 of C.P.C., seeking stay of the suit in O.S. No.62 of 2024.

The aforesaid application was dismissed by the Trial Court by giving the following reasons:

a) The earlier partition suit in O.S. No.64 of 2024 has already been disposed of on 27.11.2025;

b) The pendency of an appeal cannot be equated to pendency of a suit for the purpose of Section 10 C.P.C.;

c) Though it is true that an appeal is a continuation of the original proceedings, the language of Section 10 C.P.C. is clear and unambiguous in requiring pendency of a previously instituted suit and not an appeal;

d) Even assuming that the subject matter in both proceedings i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top