Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Abdul Quddhose, J
Maavadi Soft Tech Ventures (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anir Tech Park Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and facts concerning the request for review of an arbitration appointment order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. the lack of review jurisdiction over section 11 orders and the finality of arbitral appointment. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. summary dismissal of the review applications due to lack of maintainability. (Para 12) |
REV.APLO No. 14 of 2026
To review the order dated 22.04.2025 passed in Arb.O.P. (Com.Div) No.75 of 2025.
REV.APLO No. 15 of 2026
To review the order dated 22.04.2025 passed in Arb.O.P. (Com.Div) No.76 of 2025.
REV.APLO No. 16 of 2026
To review the order dated 22.04.2025 passed in Arb.O.P. (Com.Div) No.77 of 2025.
COMMON ORDER
The issue that arises for consideration in these review applications is whether an order passed by this Court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointing an Arbitrator can be reviewed through review applications.
2. These review applications have been filed pursuant to the permission granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court to the applicants by its order dated 16.02.2026 in SLP (Civil) Diary No.8147 of 2026. In the said Special Leave Petition (SLP), the applicants sought to withdraw th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
