SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 48479

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, M. Jothiraman, JJ
P. Karuppaiah – Appellant
Versus
Director General of Police – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellants challenge transfer orders alleging they are punitive rather than administrative. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. transfers for administrative interests or based on adverse conduct records are upheld as legitimate employer discretion. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court permits consideration of representations for re-transfer while dismissing the main appeals. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

Challenging the common order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petitions filed challenging the transfer of the appellants/writ petitioners from Special Branch, Peraiyur and T.Kallipatti respectively to Tirunelveli City Police Commissionerate, on the ground that transfer has been effected on administrative grounds, these writ appeals have been filed.

2. The main ground of challenge made before the Writ Court was that the transfer is the result of punitive action since writ petitioners were directed to be posted in non sensitive posts. It is the contention of the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants that it is not a mere transfer, whereas it is in the nature of punishment. It is further submitted that when the appellants


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top