Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K. Surender, J
Woosu Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
S. Suresh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of facts: an industrial dispute regarding termination of a trainee workman. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions regarding denial of opportunity to lead evidence versus protraction of litigation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. observations on abuse of process and failure to avail granted opportunities for evidence. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final outcome: dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 10) |
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the impugned order dated 06.04.2026 in I.D.No.189 of 2015, passed by the II Additional Labour Court, at Chennai and quash the same.
ORDER
This Writ Petition had been filed challenging the order dated 06.04.2026 in I.D.No.189 of 2015 passed by the II Additional Labour Court, Chennai.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent, though was designated as a Trainee, was engaged by the petitioner in the Quality Control Department without any training and he was directly involved in the manufacturing process. However, there is no dispute that the respondent falls within the definition of "Workman" under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 194
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
