SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 48720

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
Jeyamurugan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.14952 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S. Sabbani Karbura Jothi
For the Respondents: P. Rajagopalan

When a specific online portal and procedure under a government order exists for seeking permission to cut trees, the petitioner is required to adhere to that protocol rather than relying on a general representation to government authorities.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus to direct the authorities to permit the cutting of dry and unproductive palm trees on privately held patta land. The court examined the administrative requirements regarding the removal of such vegetation. The core issue was whether the petitioner could secure permission through a formal representation or if an established regulatory process exists for such requests. Citing procedural guidelines under government orders, the court determined that the application must be processed through the prescribed digital platform to ensure compliance with the current regulatory framework. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file an online application within two weeks, to be decided by the competent authority within one month.

Table of Content
1. the petitioner requests judicial intervention to dispose of a pending administrative representation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. the court directs the petitioner to follow the mandatory online application process established by the government. (Para 3 , 4)

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 27.03.2026 seeking permission to cut and remove dry and unproductive palm trees in the petitioner's patta land comprised in S.Nos.243/13A, 243/13B and 243/12B, situated at Keeranthai Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

ORDER

The prayer in the writ petition is to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 27.03.2026.

2. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the material records of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is to grant permission to cut and remove dry and unproductive palm trees in the petitioner's patta land in S.Nos.243/13A, 243/13B and 243/12B, situated at Keeranthai Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

3. When the matter came up for admission, the learned Government Standing Counsel would submit that the Rules had been framed by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.238, dated 12.09.2025 and the petitioner has to make an online application through Ulavan App and upon the application is made, the concerned committee will consider the same and grant permission, if eligible, in accordance with law.

4. In view thereof, this writ petition is disposed of on the following terms:

(i) Within two weeks from the date of receipt of a web copy of the order, the petitioner shall make an online application in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.238, dated 12.09.2025;

(ii) Upon the application is made, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the appropriate authority within a period of one month there from.

(iii) No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top