IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
Punitha Antony Store – Appellant
Versus
State Tax Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the challenge against ex-parte assessment and the context for non-appearance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. granting conditional remand to allow for fair adjudication on merits. (Para 4 , 5) |
Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS, to call for the records on the file of the respondent in GSTIN 33BAYPR8468J1ZL/2020-21 dated 12.01.2026 for the assessment year 2020-21 passed by the Respondent under section 74 of TNGST Act 2017 and to quash the same as cryptic, non-speaking, illegal, arbitrary, wholly without jurisdiction and direct the respondent to pass assessment order afresh after affording opportunity of being heard and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudalaimuthu
For Respondent : Mr.R.Parthiban
Government Standing Counsel
O R D E R
This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 12.01.2026 which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the GST Act 2017.
2.I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the lear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.