2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 48749
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Kumaresh Babu, J
Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Vel Crane Service – Respondent
Arb Appln No. 42 of 2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: D.Pradeep Kumar
For the Respondents: R.Rasbin
An applicant can be granted the appointment of a party receiver under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to take possession of a secured asset upon proving a prima facie case of default and the initiation of arbitration proceedings.
Headnote:The applicant sought the appointment of a party receiver under Section 9(1)(ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to seize construction equipment due to the respondent's default on loan installments established via a Loan Agreement. The court observed that the respondent failed to appear despite notice and that a prima facie case was established. The core issue was whether the applicant was entitled to the appointment of a receiver to repossess the secured asset pending arbitration. The court reasoned that in view of the admitted default and the pendency of arbitration proceedings, the appointment of a representative of the applicant as a receiver was justified to secure the asset, subject to the final arbitral award. The application for the appointment of a party receiver was allowed, with directions for potential police assistance and the respondent's right to redeem the asset upon clearing dues.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background involving loan default and non-appearance of respondent. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. granting interim measure by appointing a party receiver to secure the asset. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
Arbitration Application under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9(1)(ii)(a)(b)(d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to appoint employee of the Applicant viz Mr.N.Rajkumar, Area Business Manager, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the construction equipment which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondents men, agents, servants, from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises if necessary.
O R D E R
This application has been filed to appoint employee of the Applicant viz Mr.N.Rajkumar, Area Business Manager, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the construction equipment which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondents men, agents, servants, from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant had provided a loan to the respondent for the purchase of the aforesaid vehicle and also a Loan Agreement had also been entered by the respondent with the applicant on 26.05.2023. He would contend that there is some unremained installments that are to be made by the respondent and that in spite of repeated demands, the respondent had failed to regularize the default and had continued to not pay the EMIs. He would further submit that considering the facts of the case, the applicant had sought for an appointment of a party receiver which would be more effective.
3. In spite of notice having been effected on the respondent, the respondent had neither chosen to appear before this Court in person nor is being represented by a counsel. The name of the respondent has been reflected in the cause-list. He was called absent and set ex parte.
4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and also perused the materials placed on record.
5. This Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a prima facie case for appointment of a Party Receiver. It is to be noted that the arbitration proceedings have been initiated and it is pending before the learned Arbitrator.
6. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, this Court is satisfied with the prayer sought for in this application and in fine, Mr.N.Rajkumar, is appointed as Party Receiver to seize and take possession of the Ace Mobile Crane F230, bearing Engine No.E414CDPC428400E, Chassis No.ACE0F230TP0567525, Registration No.TN73AJ5362 from the respondent or any place belonging to the respondent or wherever found and with whomsoever it is found. It is also made clear that if police help is required, the Party Receiver shall make a request to the local police station within whose jurisdiction the vehicle is found and on such request being made, the Station House Officer shall send the Police Personnel along with the Party Receiver to seize the vehicle. If break open of a lock is required, the Party Receiver shall do so in the presence of the police personnel who will counter sign the record evidencing the break open of the lock and to re-lock the premises. If the Party Receiver finds any difficulty with the jurisdictional police, he is at liberty to approach Superintendent of Police, who shall provide all necessary assistance to him at the time of seizure of the vehicle.
7. If the respondent make good the unpaid installments or makes substantial payments of the dues to be paid to the satisfaction of the applicant, the applicant shall return the asset in the condition it was re-possessed. It is made cle