Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Abdul Quddhose, J
Sivalingam – Appellant
Versus
Govindasamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of trial court order denying re-warrant commission. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the court upholds the refusal to reissue commission warrants when cross-examination remains an open remedy. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
PRAYER
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order passed in IA.No.326 of 2019 in OS.No.358 of 2019 dated 07-08-2025 and allow the petition to remit back the warrant to the same advocate commissioner to identify the disputed land by identifying the boundary stone and F line on the file of District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Gummidipoondi.
ORDER
This civil revision petition has been filed, challenging the impugned order dated 7.8.2025 passed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Gummidipoondi in I.A. No. 326 of 2019 in O.S. No. 358 of 2019.
2. The aforesaid application was filed by the petitioners, who are the defendants in the suit, seeking to remand back the Advocate Commissioner's warrant to the same Advocate Commissioner to identify the disputed land by identifying the boundary stones and F-line for the subject property.
3. The trial court had dismissed the said application by observ
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
