Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V. Thamilselvi, J
G. Venugopal – Appellant
Versus
Manjula Venugopal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellate challenge against trial court orders regarding delay condonation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. balance of convenience and entitlement to a fair hearing in property disputes. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. non-interference in trial court discretion when justice supports fairness. (Para 8) |
PRAYER in CRP.No.5616 of 2025
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to Set aside the order dated 08.09.2025 passed by the Honble V Additional City Civil Judge at Chennai in I.A.No.4 of 2025 in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in O.S.No.2010 of 2019 and thus render justice.
PRAYER in CRP.No.5617 of 2025
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to Set aside the order dated 08.09.2025 passed by the Honble V Additional City Civil Judge at Chennai in I.A.No.5 of 2025 in I.A.No.2 of 2024 in O.S.No.2010 of 2019 and thus render justice.
In both CRPs.
For Petitioner(s): MR.R.Chandra Sudan
For Respondent(s): MR.C.UMASHANKAR FOR R1
MS.S.YOGALAKSHMI AGP FOR R1 AND R2
COMMON ORDER
Challenging the impugned order passed by the Trial Judge in I.A. Nos.1 and 2 of 2024, the plaintiff has filed I.A. Nos.4 and 5 before the Trial Court seeki
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
