IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
Govindasamy – Appellant
Versus
Joint Secretary – Respondent
WP No. 19170 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court dismisses writ as infructuous when the impugned grievance is already addressed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 3rd respondent to conduct the enquiry pending before him with regard to the complaint dated 25.06.2025 made by the petitioner for taking departmental action against the 5th respondent and others within a time frame fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner(s): Mr. W.M.Abdul Azeez
For Respondent(s): Mr.V. Prasad, Government Advocate
ORDER
The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 3rd respondent to conduct the enquiry pending before him with regard to the complaint dated 25.06.2025 made by the petitioner for taking departmental action against the 5th respondent and others within a time frame fixed by this Court.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate submitted that the Tahsildar, Vandhavasi, has passed an order dated 05.06.2026 in Na.Ka.No.A4/1901/2026, based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 25.06.2025.
3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the Tahsildar, Vandavasi, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.