SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
S A Agencies – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.14723 of 2026|W.M.P(MD)No.11071 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.Veeramanikandan
For the Respondents: R.Parthiban

An ex-parte assessment order may be set aside by the High Court to allow for a fresh hearing on merits, provided the assessee demonstrates sufficient cause for previous non-participation and complies with conditions such as depositing a portion of the disputed tax.

Headnote:The present case involves a challenge to an ex-parte assessment order passed under S.74 of the TNGST Act, 2017, due to the failure of the assessee to participate in the proceedings. The court considered the discrepancies noted and the explanation offered by the assessee for their absence, finding that justice would be served by granting an opportunity for a fresh hearing subject to equitable conditions. The central issue was whether an opportunity should be granted to the assessee to provide merits-based submissions despite the prior ex-parte ruling. The court determined that in such administrative matters, providing an opportunity to produce supporting documents is essential, provided that the petitioner complies with a fiscal condition to protect the revenue's interest while the matter is reconsidered. The writ petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside, and the matter is remanded back to the assessing officer, subject to the deposit of 25% of the disputed tax amount by the petitioner.

Table of Content
1. challenge to ex-parte assessment due to non-participation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. conditional remand for fresh assessment on merit. (Para 4 , 5)

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for records pertaining to impugned order of the 2nd Respondent in Ref.No.ZD331224039510X/2020-21 dated 05.12.2024 and quash the same and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

ORDER

This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 05.12.2024, which is an assessment order passed under Section 74 of the TNGST Act 2017 .

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate representing the revenue.

3. By the impugned orders, the assessment was made ex parte because the petitioner did not utilise the opportunities provided. The discrepancies and grounds on which the assessment order was issued, the dealer’s explanation on merits, and the reasons for not participating in the assessment proceedings are summarised briefly and presented in a table below:

Discrepancies found/Grounds on which the order is passed Explanation offered by the Assessee on merits Explanation for not availing the opportunity
Reverssal of ITC on the alleged claim of Blocked ITC The ITC claimed as neither ineligible nor blocked and the same in the course of and in furtherance of business Ex-parte order Notices and impugned order tendered only through portal – left unnoticed.

4. Considering the nature of the discrepancies noted, the explanation provided by the assessee and the reason given before this Court for not availing the opportunity, I believe that an opportunity can be granted to the assessee to present their submissions and produce the relevant supporting documents before the respondent assessing officer. This Court has been extending such opportunities on equitable grounds; however, under appropriate conditions. Therefore, an opportunity is granted to the petitioner assessee on the condition of depositing 25% of the disputed tax amount.

5. In view of this, the writ petition is allowed on the following terms:-

i. Within four weeks of receiving the web copy of the order, the petitioner shall deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount with the respondent, without waiting for a certified copy of the order.

ii. Upon such deposit, the impugned order dated 05.12.2024 shall stand set aside, and the matter shall stand remanded back to the file of the respondent.

iii. The assessee shall appear before the respondent without fail and submit their reply and documents in support of their claim, and it is for the respondent to consider the matter afresh and pass orders in accordance with law.

iv. Since the impugned order of assessment is set aside, any attachment of the bank account made pursuant to the impugned order shall stand raised.

v. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top