Ponnarasi Ruban vs Shanmuga Kani - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49139

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.P. Senthil
For the Respondents: V. Shathurthi Raja, S. Kadarkarai

Table of Content
1. admission of appeal and formulation of substantial questions of law. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. factual history regarding property ownership, power of attorney, and previous litigation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. appellant arguments regarding title validity and limits of power of attorney. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. respondent contentions regarding adverse possession and property identity. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. analysis of the limits of power of attorney and property conveyance. (Para 15 , 16 , 19 , 20)
6. assessment of continuous possession and perfection of title via adverse possession. (Para 17 , 18 , 21 , 22 , 23)
7. application of established precedents on boundaries, misdescription, and ownership. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
8. final ruling upholding the appellate court's decision based on adverse possession. (Para 34 , 36)

JUDGMENT

1.The plaintiff, aggrieved by reversal findings rendered by the First Appellate Court, is the appellant herein.

2. The Second Appeal was admitted by this Court on 15.03.2019 on the following substantial questions of law:-

(a) Whether the Lower Appellate Court has committed a serious error in law in reversing the well consi