Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Kumaresh Babu, J
Adhesh Ravi – Appellant
Versus
Sundaram Chettiar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs claim partition of alleged joint family property. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendants argue prior valid partition and limitation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. trial court dismissed suit finding partition acted upon. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. appellants contest validity; respondents uphold trial court findings. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. appellate court confirms partition's validity and binding nature. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT
1. The present appeal suit has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 11.01.2010 passed in O.S.No.15 of 2004.
PRAYER:- First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgement and decree dated 11.01.2010 made in O.S.No.15 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram.
No Appearance for RR4,7 & 10
RR1 & R5 – Died
No Appearance for R3 (Served)
Not Ready in Notice RR6 & 8
2. The Plaintiffs are the grandchildren of the 1st defendant and the children of the 3rd defendant. The 5th defendant is the wife of the 1st defendant. Defendants 2 to 4 are the sons of the 1st defendant, and Defendants 6 to 8 are th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
