Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Shamim Ahmed, J
R. Muthukumarasamy – Appellant
Versus
C. Vennila – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the revision petition against an existing maintenance order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions regarding the financial capacity and the voluntary separation of the spouse. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. judicial assessment of maintenance obligations under section 125 crpc. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final adjudication dismissing the revision due to lack of merit. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed to set aside the order dated 25.11.2025 passed in M.C.No. 29/2021 on the file of the Family Court, Cuddalore.
2. The facts of the case are that the Revision Petitioner and the 1st Respondent got married on 20.06.2011 and the 2nd Respondent is the minor male child, born to them. Due to matrimonial dispute, the 1st Redpondent had left the matrimonial home and filed MC.No.29 of 2021, seeking maintenance before the Trial Court. By the impunged order of the Trial Court, a sum of Rs.15,000/- p.m. was ordered to be paid to the Respondents (Rs.5000/= to the 1st Respondent and Rs.10,000/- to the child/2nd Respondent) as maintenance. Hence, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the Revision Petitioner, seeking the relief, as stated above.
3. This Court heard Mr.D.Baskar,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
