SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49200

WMP No.17950 of 2026
and Rev.Aplw. SR No.67254 of 2026


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS


DATED : 12.06.2026


CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,
CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN


W.M.P.No.17950 of 2026
in Rev.Aplw.SR No.67254 of 2026
against W.P.No.6642 of 2026


S.Muralidharan
Founder Indian Centre for Animal Rights
& Education (INCARE)
S/o.P.Sivalingam,
F1, No.40, R.S.Sridhar Street, Kottur,
Chennai-600 085
Applicant/
Review Applicant


Vs


1.The Commissioner,
Greater Chennai Corporation,
Ripon Buildings, Chennai-600 003.
2.The Commissioner of Food Safety,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
DMS Campus, Teynampet,
Chennai-600 006.






Respondents/
Respondents

PRAYER in W.M.P.No.17950 of 2026: Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 14 days in filing the review application.

PRAYER in Rev.Aplw.SR No.67254 of 2026: Review Application filed under Order 47, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of CPC to review the order dated 2.3.2026 passed in W.P.No.6642 of 2026.

For Applicant: Mr.S.Muralidharan
(Applicant-in-person)

For Respondents: Mr.A.Arun Babu
Standing Counsel for R1

ORDER
(Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)

Heard.

2. In support of the prayer seeking condonation of delay of 14 days, all that has been stated in the affidavit is as below:

“4. The delay in filing the present Review Petition was due to the time required to collect, verify and compile the evidence. The delay is bona fide.”

3. We have also heard the applicant on the merits of the review application and also perused the grounds.

4. There are no grounds to review the order dated 2.3.2026 passed in W.P.No.6642 of 2026. Therefore, the application seeking condonation of delay is rejected. As a consequence, the review application SR also stands dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top