Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Shamim Ahmed, J
Subhakar – Appellant
Versus
Dhanvi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the maintenance litigation background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions regarding maintenance quantum. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the purpose of maintenance and justification for the amount awarded. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final disposition of the revision petition. (Para 9) |
ORDER
1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed to call for the records relating to the order, dated 19.11.2025, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Tiruttani.
2. The facts of the case are that the Revision Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent got married on 06.12.2021 and the 1st Respondent is the minor female child, born to them. Alleging that the Revision Petitioner is not taking of the Respondents, the Redpondents had filed MC.No.9 of 2024, seeking maintenance before the Trial Court. By the impunged order of the Trial Court, a sum of Rs.20,000/- p.m. was ordered to be paid to the Respondents (Rs.10000/= to the 2nd Respondent and Rs.10,000/- to the female child/1st Respondent) as maintenance and a sum of Rs.2,60,000/- was also ordered to be paid to the Respondents towards arrears. Hence, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the Revision Petitioner, see
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
