IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Duraipandian Arumugaraja – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner (ST) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. remand of assessment order based on consensus and tax deposit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order issued vide FORM DRC-07 in Ref. No. ZD331125212265X dated 12.11.2025 for the assessment year 2021-2022, by the respondent and quash the same.
ORDER
An assessment order dated 12.11.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground that the petitioner was not provided reasonable opportunity to submit supporting documents.
2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent.
3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand under the impugned order as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.
4. Subject to the remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.