SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49304

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Sree Baagyalakshmi Farm Service – Appellant
Versus
Deputy State Tax Officer-II – Respondent
WP No. 20895 of 2026 | W.M.P. Nos.22562 and 22563 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Rajkumar P
For the Respondents: L.Gokulraj

The court may remand a tax assessment order for re-adjudication following a breach of natural justice, provided the petitioner complies with a condition of pre-depositing a specified percentage of the disputed tax demand.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an assessment order issued under the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017, alleging a breach of the principles of natural justice. The Court noted that the limitation period for filing an appeal had expired and the petitioner offered to deposit a portion of the tax demand. The Court determined that the matter warranted a fresh consideration subject to specific financial conditions. The main issue was whether the assessment order was passed in violation of natural justice principles. The ratio decidendi established that a remand for re-adjudication is permitted when the assessee demonstrates a willingness to comply with conditional pre-deposit requirements, thereby balancing administrative finality with statutory compliance. The writ petition is disposed of by setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter for fresh consideration subject to the remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand.

Table of Content
1. assessment orders challenged on natural justice grounds. (Para 1)
2. remand orders contingent on pre-deposit of tax. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the Respondent in GSTIN 33BMLPP0620H1ZA/2021-22, culminating in the Assessment Order dated 08.12.2025, passed under Section 73 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 , bearing Reference No. ZD331225104757J, along with the consequential Form GST DRC-07 dated 08.12.2025 and quash the impugned proceedings as passed contrary to the provisions of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 , and against the principles of natural justice.

For Petitioner: Mr.Rajkumar P

For Respondent: Mr.L.Gokulraj,

Government Counsel (Tax)

ORDER

An order dated 08.12.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Mr.L.Gokulraj, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand.

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top