SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49309

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS


DATED: 11-06-2026


CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY


WP No. 20977 of 2026 & WMP No.22681 of 2026


Aarthi Enterprises

Represented by its Proprietor Suresh, 14 Narayanasamy Street Pulianthope Chennai

Tamilnadu - 600012.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

Commercial Tax Officer/The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Purasavakkam Assessment Circle, Central-II, Station No.1, PAPJM Annex Building, 3rd Floor, Greams Road, cCennai - 600006.

..Respondent(s)


For Petitioner(s): Mr.Abdul Wajith E

For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Govt. Counsel(T)

Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Certiorari calling for the records in connection with the Impugned Order passed under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 / Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, including the Summary of the Order in Form GST DRC-07, dated 05.12.2025 and bearing Reference Number ZD331225082603L, together with its annexure dated 05.12.2025 having GSTIN 33APEPS5377P1Z4/2021-22, pertaining to GSTIN 33APEPS5377P1Z4 for the Financial Year 2021-22, passed by the Respondent, and quash the same, and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice

ORDER

An order dated 05.12.2025 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Mr. R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand.

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

11-06-2026

Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No

KAL

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top