SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Milka Industries Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy State Tax Officer – Respondent
WP No. 21015 of 2026 | WMP No.322706 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. Hemalatha
For the Respondents: L.Gokulraj

An impugned tax assessment order may be set aside and remanded for de novo consideration conditioned upon the payment of a specified portion of the disputed tax demand when there are allegations of a breach of natural justice.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an assessment order dated 30.12.2025, contending that there was a breach of the principles of natural justice. The Court noted that the period of limitation for filing an appeal had expired and that the petitioner had agreed to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand to facilitate a re-adjudication. The primary issue was whether the impugned order should be set aside and remanded for reconsideration in light of the petitioner's willingness to deposit a portion of the tax liability. Relying on the petitioner's undertaking, the court reasoned that providing a reasonable opportunity for a fresh hearing would serve the interests of justice, provided the tax payment condition was satisfied. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter for fresh consideration subject to the remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand.

Table of Content
1. assessment orders challenged on procedural grounds where appeal time has expired. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. remand of matter for fresh consideration conditional upon partial tax payment. (Para 4 , 5)

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the respondent in the order vide GSTIN 33AACCM4647A1ZY/2021-22 dated 30.12.2025 along with the consequential summary order under section 73 of TNGST/CGST Act, 2017 issued vide FORM DRC-07 bearing Ref No. ZD331225437792D dated 30.12.2025 for the financial year 2021-2022, to quash the same and pass

ORDER

An order dated 30.12.2025 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Mr. L.Gokulraj, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand.

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

11-06-2026

Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No

KAL

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top