Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, M. Jothiraman, JJ
Karuppasamy – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. non-maintainability of writ petitions due to pending statutory appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court’s discretion to direct the appellate authority to resolve factual grievances during pending appeals. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order in Na.Ka.A5/7841/2025 dated 27.05.2026 issued by the 2nd respondent under section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 as illegal and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct survey of Public pathway in S.No.37/5 and adjoining Survey Nos.37/40 and 37/41 situated at Keelamudhukalathur Group Village, Mudhukalathur Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, in the presence of the petitioners after due notice within time frame fixed by this court.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Rajasekar
For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Parthiban
Counsel for State
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
WMP(MD)No.11878 of 2026 filed to permit the petitioners to join together and file a single writ petition, is ordered.
2. Challenging the order passed und
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
