SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49482

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS


DATED: 10-06-2026


CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


WP No. 48500 of 2025

WMP No.54159 of 2025



1. M.Mariyammal

W/o.Mohan, No.303, Nethaji Street,

Pullarambakkam Village And Post, Tiruvallur

Taluk, Tiruvallur District-602 023


2. S.Subramani

S/o.Sdayappan, Peritivakkam Village,

Pondavakkam Post, Uthukottai Taluk, Tiruvallur

District-602 026


3. P.Murugaiyan

S/o.Parthasarathy, No.470, Bharathidasan Street,

Pullarambakkam Village And Post, Tiruvallur

Taluk, Tiruvallur Distrct-602 023


..Petitioner(s)


Vs


1. The District Collector

Collector Office Building, Tiruvallur


2. The District Revenue Officer

Collector Office Building, Tiruvallur


3. The Tahsildar

Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur District


4. Kumar

S/o.M.Etti, Pullarambakkam Village And Post,

Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur District-602 023


5. Chandran

S/o.Muthu, Pullarambakkam Village And Post,

Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur District-602 023


6. Punitharaj

S/o.Late.Venugopal, Pullarambakkam Village And

Post, Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur District-602 203


7. Mathivanan

S/o.Late.Venugopal, Pullarambakkam Village And

Post, Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur District-602 203


8. Jagathsirpi

S/o.Late.Venugopal, Pullarambakkam Village And

Post, Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur District-602 203


9. Hariharan

S/o.Late.Venugopal, Pullarambakkam Village And

Post, Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur District-602 203


10.Vinothkumar

S/o.Late.Mari, Pullarambakkam Village And Post,

Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur District-602 203


11.Sudarsanam

S/o.Late.Mari, Pullarambakkam Village And Post,

Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur District-602 203


12.S.Mohan

S/o.Late.G.Selvaraj, No.19/47, Manikavinayaga

Kovil Street, Vyasarpadi, Chennai-600 039


13.Kavya Constructions And Developers Pvt Ltd

Rep By Its Director, Ethirunavukarasu, No.11/27,

Perumal Koil Street, Rajanguppam,

Ayanambakkam Post, Chennai-600 095


..Respondent(s)



For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.Arunprasad


For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan

Government Counsel for R1 to R3


Mr.R.Arunkumar for R13


For R12 – No appearance


For R4 to R11 – Not ready in notice

PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against 13th respondent and cancel the patta No.3737 and 3789 and based on the representations dated 26.8.2021 and 25.8.2025 given by the petitioners.

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the 13th respondent and to cancel Patta Nos. 3737 and 3789, by considering the representations dated 26.08.2021 and 25.08.2025 submitted by the petitioner.

2. According to the petitioner, representations were submitted to the official respondents seeking cancellation of Patta Nos. 3737 and 3789 issued in favour of the 13th respondent. The petitioner contends that though an enquiry was initiated, no final order has been passed thereon till date.

3. The learned Government Counsel would submit that no enquiry has been conducted so far. He requests a period of twelve weeks’ time to conduct an enquiry and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner’s grievance.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the 13th respondent reiterates the contentions raised in the counter-affidavit and strongly objects to the cancellation of the patta. He further submits that the 13th respondent will duly participate in any enquiry conducted by the authorities and seeks liberty to file a detailed explanation/reply before the official respondents.

5. This Court finds force in the contentions raised by the learned counsel appearing on either side.

6. On a perusal of the records, it is seen that the petitioner’s representations dated 26.08.2021 and 25.08.2025 seeking cancellation of the pattas issued in favour of the 13th respondent are still pending. It also appears that the Revenue Divisional Officer concerned, who is the competent statutory authority to consider the petitioner’s grievance, has not been impleaded as a party to this Writ Petition.

7. Therefore, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the competent Revenue Divisional Officer within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, the Revenue Divisional Officer concerned shall consider and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the 13th respondent, and any other interested parties, within a period of twelve (12) weeks thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top