SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49515

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
A.K. Milk Agency – Appellant
Versus
Depuity State Tax Officer-II – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.15544 of 2026 | W.M.P(MD)No.11644 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.Karunakar
For the Respondents: P.Rajagopalan

An ex parte assessment order passed without allowing the taxpayer an opportunity to present evidence regarding tax-exempt goods violates natural justice, necessitating a remand for de novo consideration.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an assessment order passed under S. 73 of the GST Act, 2017, due to an ex parte decision where no opportunity was provided. The court observed that the petitioner deals in goods exempted from tax and had missed the initial notice period. The court determined that the matter warrants reconsideration to ensure natural justice. The main issue was whether the assessment order could be sustained given the ex parte nature of the proceedings. The court reasoned that in the interest of justice, when a taxpayer claims exemption on products, they must be afforded an opportunity to present documents and reply to show cause notices to avoid unjust tax liability. The Writ Petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside, and the matter is remanded to the respondent for fresh adjudication.

Table of Content
1. remand of assessment order to allow taxpayer to present evidence for tax exemptions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)

Prayer :Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in the impugned Order in GSTIN Ref No. 33BZBPB4966R1ZY / 2021-22 dated 16.12.2025 issued by the Respondent and quash the same as it is without jurisdiction and clear violation of statutory provisions.

ORDER

This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 16.12.2025 which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the GST Act 2017 .

2.I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

3.Upon perusal of the impugned orders, it can be seen that the petitioner did not avail the opportunity, when the show cause notice is uploaded and the final order was passed. Accordingly, the impugned ex parte orders came to be passed.

4.Considering the plea made by the petitioner that the petitioner is dealing Milk and Milk Products which are exempted from tax, additional condition is not imposed.

5.In view thereof, the Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms:

(i)The impugned order dated 16.12.2025 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the file of the respondent for reconsideration.

(ii)The assessee shall appear before the respondent without fail and submit their reply and documents in support of their claim, and it is for the respondent to consider the matter afresh and pass orders in accordance with law.

(iv)Since the impugned order of assessment is set aside, any attachment of the bank account made pursuant to the impugned order shall raised.

(v)No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top