SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49523

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT


DATED :10.06.2026


CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY


W.P(MD)No.15584 of 2026

and

W.M.P(MD)No.11684 of 2026


Tvl. G Muthuramalingam

Represented by its Proprietor,

G. Muthuramalingam,

No.3/56, Nallamanaickenpatti,

Thirumangalam,

Madurai - 625 701. ... Petitioner(s)

– Vs. -

The Proper Officer /

Deputy State Tax Officer - Ii /

The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer,

Thirumangalam Assessment Circle,

Thirumangalam,

Madurai District. ... Respondent(s)

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Raja Karthikeyan
For the Respondents: S.Vashik Ali

The court may set aside an ex parte tax assessment order and remand the matter for fresh adjudication without imposing a pre-deposit condition where the assessee has demonstrated good faith and partial tax recovery has already been achieved.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an ex parte assessment order passed under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court observed that the petitioner failed to respond to the initial show cause notice, leading to the impugned order. Given that a significant portion of the tax demand had already been recovered, the court exercised discretion to set aside the order and remit the matter for fresh adjudication. The core issues involved the validity of the ex parte assessment and the conditions for remand. The court reasoned that in the interest of justice, providing an opportunity for the assessee to present their case outweighs the necessity of a pre-deposit condition, particularly when partial recovery has already occurred. The writ petition is ordered, the impugned assessment order is set aside, the matter is remanded for fresh proceedings, and the bank account freezing is lifted.

Prayer :Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS, calling for the impugned assessment order on the file of respondent vide GSTIN 33BCDPM0294G1ZU/2021-22 and in summary order Reference No. ZD331225008993G dated 01.12.2025 and quash the same as illegal and devoid of merits and direct the respondent to redo the assessment proceedings for the year 2021-22 and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

For Petitioner : Mr.Raja Karthikeyan

For Respondent : Mr.S.Vashik Ali

Government Standing Counsel

O R D E R

This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 01.12.2025. The same is an order of assessment passed under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

2.Upon perusal of the impugned orders, it can be seen that the petitioner did not avail the opportunity, when the show cause notice is uploaded and the final order was passed. Accordingly, the impugned ex parte orders came to be passed.

3.Normally, this Court imposes a condition of 25% deposit for remitting the matter back. In this case, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since 33% CGST and 53% SGST has already been recovered, no need to impose additional condition.

4.This Court, takes into account the said submission, is of the view that one more opportunity can be granted to the petitioner. This writ petition is ordered on the following terms:

(i)Since 33% CGST and 53% SGST has already been recovered, the impugned order dated 01.12.2025 shall stand set aside and the matter stands remitted back to the file of the respondent.

(ii)The petitioner shall appear before the respondent without fail and file such reply and produce such documentary evidence in support of his claim and the respondent authority shall pass orders fresh in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.

(ii)It is also made clear that since the matter is remanded back for fresh disposal, freezing of the petitioner's bank account shall stand raised.

(iii)No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top