Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. Subramaniam, N. Senthilkumar, JJ
M. Kranthi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual record of compassionate appointment rejection based on eligibility points. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. compassionate appointment is a non-absolute, conditional concession. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. judicial endorsement of administrative compliance with scheme criteria. (Para 5) |
Prayer: Calling for the records connected with the impugned order passed by the Hon’ble Central Administrative tribunal, Chennai Bench in OA/310/00193/2022 dated 03.04.2023 so far as the rejection of compassionate appointment is concerned and direct the Respondents to consider the name of the Petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds in any suitable post commensurate with his qualification.
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
The present Writ Petition has been instituted, challenging the order of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 03.04.2023 in O.A.No.310/00193/2022. Applicant before CAT is Writ Petitioner herein.
2. Father of writ petitioner Late Manohar was initially appointed on temporary basis in the year 1981 and was made permanent on 01.05.1992. He was subsequently promoted to the post of Telephone Mechanic on 13.02.2003 and due to illness, he died on 20.0
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
