SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49575

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
Sivanmalaiappan – Appellant
Versus
Easwari – Respondent
CRP No. 2940 of 2026|CMP NO. 12076 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.Marudhachalam
For the Respondents: S.Akila

A revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution cannot be used to strike off execution proceedings when an ex parte decree has attained finality and no stay of proceedings is in operation.

Headnote:The present case involves a petition seeking to strike off execution proceedings initiated under the Code of Civil Procedure following an ex parte decree and subsequent dismissal of restoration applications. The court examined whether a revision petition under Article 227 is the appropriate remedy where alternative legal avenues such as appeals or restoration applications have lapsed or were dismissed for default. The core issue was the maintainability of a request to strike off an execution petition when no stay is in force and previous attempts to set aside the decree had failed. The court reasoned that in the absence of a pending appeal or valid stay, execution proceedings are maintainable. The court observed that the petitioner must pursue statutory remedies rather than seeking to strike off proceedings through revisionary jurisdiction. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with the order that the execution petition remains maintainable.

Table of Content
1. maintainability of execution proceedings in the absence of a stay or pending appeal. (Para 1 , 2)
PRAYER

Civil Revision Petition filed under Art.227 of Constitution of India, praying to Strike Out the E.P.No.22 of 2026 in O.S.No.471 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pollachi, and allow the CRP.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Marudhachalam

For Respondent(s): Ms.S.Akila For R1 To R4

R5 To 9 - Service Awaited

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking to strike off the petition filed in E.P.No.22 of 2026 in O.S.No.471 of 2007 before the learned District Munsif, Pollachi.

2. Before the Executing Court, the respondents/decree holders 1 to 3 have initiated execution proceedings in E.P.No.22 of 2026 against the revision petitioner, wherein he has not appeared, since after the death of father, he was not aware of the proceedings. So, he filed the application in I.A.No.5 of 2025 to set aside the exparte order dated 21.07.2022 as the petitioner was not able to appear in the suit as well as in the final decree application filed in I.A.No.1 of 2022 and the said application was consequently dismissed for default. However, he preferred an appeal in A.S.No.36 of 2018, which was also dismissed as steps were not taken. So, as on date, no proceedings is pending against the final decree. Therefore, the plaintiff had filed the said execution petition and as on date, there is no stay proceedings against the Execution Petition. Hence, the

reason assigned to strike off the proceedings of E.P. as such is not maintainable. The suit was decreed on contest. As on date, no appeal is also pending. If at all, the revision petitioner is having any grievance, he has to work out his remedy either by preferring an appeal or to file the restoration application. Thus, the filing of E.P. as such is maintainable and it does not require any interference. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top