Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, P.B. Balaji, JJ
Vengitasubbramaniyan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis of habeas corpus due to missing family members. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court direction for production without determining custody. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
Prayer :Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus Petition, to direct the respondent to secure and produce the body or person of the petitioner's wife and children, namely, Shanthi (aged 39 years), Kali Sri (aged about 17 years), Ganga Sri (aged about 15 years) and Surya Pandian (aged 11 years) before this Court and set them at liberty.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH,J.)
This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to secure the detenue and the three children and to set them at liberty.
2. Heard the learned counsel on either side.
3. The case of the petitioner is that he was married to the detenue in the year 2007 and there are three children out of the wedlock. Due to some misunderstanding, there was a quarrel on 15.05.2026. From 17.05.2026, the detenue along with three children were missing and in spite of best efforts, their whereabouts were not able to be ascertained. Under such circumstances, a complai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
