Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
V. Thangarajan – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts regarding non-payment of gratuity. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. judicial direction to dispose of pending representation within specific timeframe. (Para 3 , 4) |
Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 30.06.2025 and 18.12.2025 pertaining to gratuity balance Rs. 28,313/- with interest to petitioner.
Order
This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
“To direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 30.06.2025 and 18.12.2025 pertaining to gratuity balance Rs. 28,313/- with interest to petitioner.”
2. The petitioner worked as a Driver in the 1st respondent corporation from 15.01.1983 to 15.03.1995. The petitioner’s case is that his gratuity amount has not been fully settled to him. Therefore, he made a representation to respondents in this regard. Since there is no response the petitioner is before this Court.
3. Considering the limited relief sought in this writ petition, a mandamus is issued. The 1st respondent is directed to consider the petitoiner’s representation dated 18.1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
