Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. Asha, J
Abdul Mazeeth – Appellant
Versus
Metropolitan Transport Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to disburse terminal benefits post-superannuation necessitates judicial intervention. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court directs payment of terminal benefits with interest for delayed disbursement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent herein to settle the retirement benefits with 6 percentage interest to the petitioner herein by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 27.03.2026 and 15.04.2026.
Order
This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
“To direct the 1st respondent herein to settle the retirement benefits with 6 percentage interest to the petitioner herein by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 27.03.2026 and 15.04.2026.”
2.The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed in the respondent corporation on 15.09.1988 and retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.03.2026. However, the terminal benefits have not been settled to the petitioner till date. Therefore, the petitioner had submitted a representation to the respondent dated 27.03.2026 and 15.04.2026, requesting them to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
