Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
R. Usha – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to administrative cancellation of a registered settlement deed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding the validity and maintenance obligations. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal standard regarding unilateral cancellation of registered conveyances. (Para 6) |
| 4. final order setting aside cancellation with maintenance conditions. (Para 7 , 8) |
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in Ni.Mu.En.6633/2023/Aa dated 22.02.2024 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction and for consequential orders.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the daughter of the second respondent. The second respondent executed settlement deed bearing Doc.No.4981/2014 in favour of the petitioner on 23.07.2014 and thereafter at the instigation of the petitioner’s brother/ son of the second respondent, the second respondent filed complaint before the first respondent and the first respondent cancelled the settlement deed executed by the second respondent.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
