SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49703

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.Victoria Gowri, J
Ramanathan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3015 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.Balaji
For the Respondents: D.Rajaboopathy

The High Court may issue a Writ of Mandamus directing police authorities to conduct an enquiry into a citizen's complaint within a specified timeframe, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with the relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

Headnote:The present case involves a plea under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct police authorities to act upon a representation regarding a complaint against a private individual. The court examined the submission that a complaint was filed but no action had been taken, while the State responded that an enquiry is currently pending. The court observed that the police authorities should conduct an enquiry in accordance with law. The core issue is the duty of the police to dispose of representations filed by citizens. The ratio decidendi established that authorities are bound to conduct an enquiry after issuing necessary summons to concerned parties, ensuring adherence to procedural fairness under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The writ petition is disposed of with directions for the police to conclude the enquiry within four weeks.

Table of Content
1. initiating a writ of mandamus for police action on pending representations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court directive to police for enquiry under bnss provisions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to consider petitioner's representation dated 18.05.2026 to enquire and take appropriate legal action against 4th respondent and his henchmen`s.

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 herein to consider petitioner's representation dated 18.05.2026 to enquire and take appropriate legal action against 4th respondent and his henchmen.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has lodged a complaint against the fourth accused. However, no proper action was taken, and therefore, this petition was filed.

3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that the enquiry is pending.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the private respondent, notice to him is dispensed with.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the third respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.05.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions.

09.06.2026

NCC : Yes / No

Index : Yes / No

sm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top